SEELECTS

SEELECTS of ‘Slavic and East-European Lectures’ is een lezingenreeks. Het biedt een forum aan nationale en internationale onderzoekers. De thema’s die aan bod komen hebben alle betrekking op Oost- en Zuidoost-Europa, maar beperken zich niet tot Slavische topics alleen. De thema’s zijn eerder breed explorerend dan eng toegespitst.

SEELECTS or ‘Slavic and East-European lectures’ is a series of scholarly lectures. It is a forum for national and international scholars. All presentations cover East and Southeast Europe, but are not restricted to Slavic topics alone. The talks are rather broad and exploratory, than all too narrow or specific.

 

Programma 2019-2020

Organizer: Aleksey Yudin

  • Do
    24
    Okt
    2019

    Romantic Space of Savagery, Violence and Freedom: Southern Siberia in the European Imagination of the 19th and early 20th Centuries

    18:30Campus Boekentoren, Blandijn, Faculteitsraadzaal

    Pavel Alekseev (Gorno-Altaisk)

    In the 19th and early 20th century, southern Siberia became an attractive place for European travelers interested in discovering and exploring this mountain system on the Russian-Chinese frontier. After the Parisian publication in 1842 of Peter Chikhachev's book «Voyage scientifique dans l’Altaï oriental», this space gained a reputation as «a Museum of wildness in the open air» - nature, aborigines and even Russian officials and colonists of southern Siberia were described by Europeans as typically Eastern. This space was both a space of primeval innocence and poverty, and of barbarous cruelty and cunning.

    On the one hand, southern Siberia was a part of the Russian Empire - it was incorporated into Imperial practices, christianized and served as an Outpost of Russia in the region. On the other hand, this land was the habitat of peoples at the lowest stage of civilization. Wild rites, cruel customs and naive worldview of the «children of the mountains» subjected to double oppression (by tribal leaders and by Russian officials) constitute the main feature of the image of Altai, which until the 21st century determines the semiotic status of this Russian mounain frontier.

    At the same time, southern Siberia was interesting not in itself, but as a complex barrier on the way to the East: to China, the Kazakh and Mongolian steppes. Based on the book of Chikhachev and travelogues of such English travelers of the mid-19th - early 20th century as Thomas and Lucy Atkinson, Harald Swayne and Prince San Donato, we will see how the Altai mountains were included in the European discourses of Orientalism.

  • Do
    14
    Nov.
    2019

    Serbian Literature Between Aesthetics and Politics: Milorad Pavić’s Dictionary of the Khazars

    18:30Campus Boekentoren, Blandijn, Faculteitsraadzaal

    Milica Mustur (Belgrado)

    The "lexicon novel" Dictionary of the Khazars (Hazarski rečnik, 1984) by the Serbian writer Milorad Pavić and its translation into most of European languages mark the last great moment  in the history of Western European reception of Serbian literature. The remarkable success of the novel within a great readership went along with wide recognition by professional critics, who declared Pavić one of the leaders of postmodern literature and his Dictionary of the Khazars "the first novel of the 21st century".

    Those qualifications derived both from the novel's plot and its – at the time – somewhat peculiar formal features. The Dictionary tells the story of the strange historical fate of the Khazars, respectively their disappearance from history after converting to a new religion under circumstances that allow only speculation. The novel formally imitates the structure of a lexicon, where narration is placed within encyclopedical entries. Furthermore, it is divided into three "books", all of which are representing the sources on the Khazarian question from the viewpoint of one of the three Abrahamic religions – Chistianity, Judaism and Islam – all declaring to represent the truth by claiming the religious conversion of the Khazars for themselves.

    Dealing with questions about the nature and the epistemological status of truth, Dictionary of the Khazars has been, among others, celebrated as a masterpiece of postmodern historical metafiction as well as a literary manifesto of religious tolerance. However, during the Civil War in Jugoslavia, Milorad Pavić's work underwent a radical change in reception under direct influence of Western politics towards Serbia on literary criticism. Formerly praised as an author of religious tolerance, Pavić was all of a sudden morally stigmatized as a Serbian nationalist as one of his later novels was purposely misinterpreted as a symbolic representation of Serbian nationalist aspirations. Along with the mentioned novel, the once highly praised Dictionary of the Khazars and his author were expelled from the Western European literary consciousness.

    Two main questions arise from the topic described: Can the shadow of politics hanging over the Western reception of Serbian literature ever be removed? Could the Dictionary of the Khazars with its fascinating and provocative focus on truth again become relevant in the context of a Western European cultural tradition, strongly determined by the discourse on truth and epistemology?

  • Do
    12
    Dec.
    2019

    Orphism and Late Communism in Bulgaria

    18:30Campus Boekentoren, Blandijn, Faculteitsraadzaal

    Miglena Nikolchina (Sofia)

    Whether Orpheus was a contested historical figure, a mystagogue, or a mythical personification of the poet, the story of his genius, his love, and his tragic death has been connected by ancient sources to Thrace, a region to the south of the Balkan Mountains. This gave Orpheus a special standing in the early construction of Bulgarian national identity, which came into new prominence with the failure of communist ideology and the advancement of Thracian studies in archeology and historiography. The lecture will discuss “Orphism” as the 1980s theoretical counterpart to these developments. It will explore both its political implications in the last decade of the communist regime and its contemporary follow-up in divergent philosophical trends.

  • Do
    20
    Feb
    2020

    Biaspectual Verbs in Slavic Languages and (specifically) in Russian

    18:00Campus Boekentoren, Blandijn, lokaal 160.015

    Vladimir Plungian (Moscow)

    Biaspectual are (rare) Slavic verbs which do not distinguish morphologically perfective and imperfective forms. Each verbal form of a biaspectual verbs can be (in principle!) construed either as perfective or imperfective. However, context usually resolves this ambiguity, so biaspectuality can be considered an instance of grammatical homonymy. The traditional view is that biaspectual verbs constitute a very limited and fixed class of native verbs (plus some loan verbs, not well integrated in the native morphological system).

    However, recent studies demonstrate that biaspectual verbs are (much?) more numerous than meets the eye and that the whole picture is by far more complicated, both synchronically and duachronically. As for Russian, biaspectual verbs still remain a relatively stable component of its morphological system. The talk will provide several interesting case studies.

  • Do
    19
    Mar
    2020

    (Mis)Managing the Past: Politics of 'Decommunisation' in Ukraine, 1990s – 2018

    18:00Campus Boekentoren, Blandijn, lokaal 160.015

    Georgi Kassianov (Kiev)

    The paper provides a brief outline of the politics of 'decommunisation' undertaken by different mnemonic actors in Ukraine since the end of 1980s. 'Decommunisation' is the process of dismantling the legacies of the communist state establishments, culture, and psychology in the post-communist space. Special attention will be paid to the final 'decommunisation' effort in 2015 - 2018, after special 'decommunisation' laws were passed by the Ukrainian Parliament. The presentation will analyse interests and roles of political actors, societal responses and political outcomes of 'decommunisation'.

  • Do
    07
    Mei
    2020

    Binary oppositions in Slavic Languages and Cultures via the Data of an Associative Experiment

    18:00Campus Boekentoren, Blandijn, lokaal 160.015

    Svitlana Martinek (Lviv)

    Starting from Lévi-Strauss (1963), binary oppositions have been considered as a powerful tool to elucidate the fundamental structures of human consciousness, culture, and language. Conversely, in the writings by Jacques Derrida (esp. in 1977), the method of binary opposition was subjected to considerable criticism. The main aim of Derrida’s deconstruction is to transform the traditional binary oppositions of Western discourse and to disclose their asymmetry, changes in the hierarchy of their members, and the transference of a member in the opposition, often in the form of a new and expanded definition. Nowadays the anthropocentric approach in linguistics, which explores the forms of knowledge representation and cognitive mechanisms via language, enables a new opportunity in studying of binary oppositions.

    The empirical investigation of binary oppositions US – THEM, LIGHT – DARK, and LEFT - RIGHT in Polish, Russian, and Ukrainian linguacultures are based on the data obtained via the associative experiment conducted with native speakers of these languages and presented in the Associative Thesauri. Associative responses are claimed to be not arbitrary but motivated by hierarchical conceptual structures existing in consciousness of the bearers of the above mentioned cultures and languages.

    The responses given by the speakers not only reveal corresponding cognitive domains and their specific traits but also allow ranking them according to their relative prominence for the representatives of particular linguacultures. They unveil both the remnants of ancient semiotic systems in contemporary speakers’ minds and the changes occurring in respective conceptual structures.

 

Vorige reeksen